MATH3401

Complex Analysis

Lecture 22

Cauchy Integral formula

An extension

Let \(f\) be analytic in and on \(C\), a simple closed curve in \(\C\), traversed in the positive sense, and let \(z_0\in \text{Int}\,C\). From Lecture 21:

Cauchy \(\Rightarrow f(z_0) = \ds \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0} dz\).

Cauchy Integral formula

An extension

Theorem: \[ f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}} dz, \quad (1) \] for \(n>1\).

Cauchy Integral formula

An extension

For \(f= u + i v \), \(\,f\) analytic at \(z_0 = x_0+ i y_0\) implies partials of all orders of \(u\) and \(v\) exist and are continuous at \((x_0, y_0)\).

c. f.   the situation in \(\R\),   e. g.   \(f(x)=|x|^3\), \(f, f' , f''\) are all contiuous on \(\R\), but \(f'''(0)\) does not exist.

Note: If \(f\) is analytic at \(z_0\), then its derivatives of all orders exist and are analytic at \(z_0\).

Proof: 📝 Check it!

Morera's Theorem

Theorem: Let \(f\) be continuous on a domain \(\Omega\). If \[ \int_C f = 0, \] for every closed contour \(C\) lying in \(\Omega\), then \(f\) is analytic in \(\Omega\).

Morera's Theorem

Proof: From Theorem in Lecture 19 we know that \(f\) has a primitive on \(\Omega\), say \(F\).

But then \(F'=f\) exists and is continuous on \(\Omega\) by the conditions of this theorem, \(F\) is analytic.

Hence by the previous Note \(\,f=F'\) is also analytic. \(\square\)

Consequences of the extension

of the Cauchy Integral Formula

A number of nice results follow from the extension of the Cauchy Integral Formula.

I. Let \(f\) be analytic in and on \(C_R(z_0)\), and set \(M_R= \ds \max_{z\in C_R}|\,f(z_0)|\). Then \[ \left|\,f^{(n)}(z_0)\right| \leq \frac{n!M_R}{R^n} \qquad (2) \]

Consequences of the extension

of the Cauchy Integral Formula

Proof: Note \(M_R\) is well defined (extreme value theorem).

\(\left|\,f^{(n)}(z_0)\right|\) \(= \left| \ds \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{C_R} \frac{f(z) dz}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}} \right|\) \(\leq \ds \frac{n!}{2 \pi } \int_{C_R} \frac{|\,f(z)|dz}{|z-z_0|^{n+1}}\)

\(\qquad \quad \; \leq \ds \frac{n! M_R}{2 \pi \, R^{n+1} } \int_{C_R} dz\) \(= \ds \frac{n! M_R}{2 \pi \,R \, R^n} 2 \pi \,R\) \(= \ds \frac{n! M_R}{R^n}\).

That is, \(\left|\,f^{(n)}(z_0)\right| \leq\ds \frac{n! M_R}{R^n}\). \(\square\)

Consequences of the extension

of the Cauchy Integral Formula

II. Liouville   If \(f: \C \ra \C\) is bounded and entire. Then \(f\) is constant.

Consequences of the extension

of the Cauchy Integral Formula

Proof: Suppose that \(|\,f|\leq M\) on \(\C\), \(f\) entire. Apply \((2)\) for \(n=1\) on \[ C_R= \left\{z_0+ Re^{i\theta}, 0\leq \theta \leq 2 \pi \right\}. \]

Then \[ \left|\,f'(z_0)\right| \leq \frac{1! M}{R} = \frac{M}{R}. \]

Letting \(R\ra \infty\), we see that there must hold: \(f'(z_0) =0\). Since \(z_0\) was arbitrary, we're done. \(\square\)

Consequences of the extension

of the Cauchy Integral Formula

II. Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Credits